🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive move to prohibit social media access for young people below 16 is creating waves around the globe. Politicians, campaigners, and guardians are monitoring closely to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

Across Europe Trend

Across Europe, a increasing number of nations are moving toward parallel bans.

• Denmark has announced a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader stating that phones and networks are "taking away our kids' childhood". The policy could be enacted in the coming year.
• Norway is set to introduce a access barrier of 15, citing the need to safeguard children from the "influence of the AI".
• The Irish government is working on a digital ID system to confirm the user details of social media users. Authorities have suggested that an Australian-model ban remains "a potential tools under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has asked lawmakers to enact a proposal raising the access age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a related step, including an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The government in The Dutch government has recommended guardians to block their children from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has adopted a non-binding motion demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 without guardian approval is provided. While it cautions of the "habit-forming" nature of these services, the step does not establish enforceable legislation.

"An effective age limit is a solid foundation," said the European lawmaker driving the resolution.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Eye

Across Britain, the government has remained open to a future ban, stating that "no measure is discarded" but insisting any policy must be "grounded in robust research".

Earlier, interest built behind a bill to enact controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end modified. Nonetheless, the government vowed to further research the matter.

Campaign organizations have voiced warnings. One foundation established by the loved ones of a girl who took her own life after being exposed to harmful platform posts contends that a simple age ban might not improve online safety and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when users turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the failure of the tech sector to design platforms and apps that are appropriate and suitable for young users," said a leading peer.

The United States: A Decentralized Landscape

In the United States, legislation is largely occurring at the state government level against a backdrop of country-wide stalemate.

• Utah mandates guardian permission for minors to use social media and limits late-night use.
• The state of Florida has passed a law barring under-14s from accessing social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a law restricting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with any further access requiring adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also passed bills mandating adult authorization for minors to open social media accounts.

Despite bipartisan support and proposals from some individuals to follow this lead, a federal ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Views

Apart from the West, other states are likewise taking action.

• The Malaysian government plans to prohibit social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• Brazil has raised the required age for one major platform to 16.

However, world organizations adopt a more cautious stance. The UN children's agency has cautioned that social media bans carry risks and "could have unintended consequences". The body notes that social networks can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable children and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to improve safety.

While this international debate evolves, the actions of the Australian government and others demonstrate that governments globally are increasingly prepared to stand by for the industry to make changes on their own.